The Conservation Blog

Archives:

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010 

May 2010 

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010 

January 2010

 

August 20th, 2010

This year, two initiatives will appear on Alaskans' primary ballot. These brief, informative descriptions have been published by the State of Alaska Division of Elections.

Ballot Measure #1, 07ANCO - Initiative Prohibiting the Use of Public Funds to Lobby or Campaign; and Prohibiting Holders of Government Contracts and Family Members from Making Political Contributions.

This bill would ban the use of public funds for political campaigns and lobbying by state and local government agencies, and school districts. Public funds could not be used to support or oppose ballot measures, lobby to pass a law, or ask for public funding. Any entity that lobbies or campaigns would be barred from receiving public funds. It would ban political contributions by government contract holders and members of their families. It would ban legislators and their staff from being employed by government contract holders for two years after leaving state service. The bill has criminal and civil penalties.

Alaska Conservation Voters opposes Ballot Measure #1. This bill would silence public servants, restrict the participation of local business in the electoral processes while leaving large mult-nationals unaffected, and prohibit upstanding Alaskan citizens involved with non-profits from taking part in the campaigning process to their fullest potential. We believe this bill to be an attack on every Alaskan's right to free speech and encourage our members to oppose its passage by voting No on 1. Visit http://bit.ly/cUbJMG to find early-voting centers near you!

Ballot Measure #2, 09PIMA - Abortion for Minor Requires Notice to or Consent from Parent or Guardian or Through Judicial Bypass

This bill would change the law to require notice to the parent or guardian of a female under the age of 18 before she has an abortion. Currently, a female under 18 may have an abortion with no notice to her parent or guardian. The bill includes detailed requirements for the notice, including that the minor’s doctor must provide the notice at least 48 hours before the procedure. This waiting period would be waived if a parent or guardian gives consent. The bill also allows the minor to go to court to authorize an abortion without giving notice to her parent or guardian. The minor could ask the court to excuse her from school to attend the hearings and to have the abortion. The court could direct the school not to tell the minor’s parent or guardian of the minor’s pregnancy, abortion, or absence from school. The bill allows a minor who is a victim of abuse by her parent or guardian to get an abortion without notice or consent. To do this, the minor and an adult relative or authorized official with personal knowledge of the abuse must sign a notarized statement about the abuse. The bill would make it a felony for a doctor to knowingly violate the statutory notice provisions for giving the minor’s parents notice of the minor’s intent to have an abortion. The bill sets out a doctor’s defense for performing an abortion without first providing notice or obtaining consent where the minor faces an immediate threat of death or permanent physical harm from continuing the pregnancy. Doctors who perform abortions on a minor would have to submit reports. This bill amends a law passed by the legislature in 1997 that is on the books but which may not be enforced because of a Court decision. The 1997 law was known as the “Parental Consent Act.” This bill makes changes to the 1997 law to address concerns in the Court decision and seeks to make the law, as amended, enforceable.

Alaska Conservation Voters has not taken a position on Ballot Measure #2. 

Voting on these issues makes your opinion count. However you feel about this year's intiatives, it is important that you head to your local polling place or vote by mail. The voices of Alaskans need to be heard in order to create a healthy, prosperous future. For more information on voter registration and how to vote in your area, vist http://www.elections.alaska.gov/.  

August 19th, 2010

On Tuesday, August 17th, members of the Alaska conservation community had the pleasure of meeting with Dr. Arun Majumdar, Director of the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) – Energy.  Dr. Majumdar talked about the work that his agency will focus on and possible roles for Alaska’s incredible energy resource potential.  For more information on APRA – Energy and Dr. Majumdar, visit http://arpa-e.energy.gov/.  

About the Advanced Research Projects Agency: 

Recognizing the need to reevaluate the way the United States spurs innovation, the National Academies released a 2006 report, “Rising Above the Gathering Storm”, that included the recommendation to establish an Advanced Research Projects Agency—Energy (ARPA-E) within the Department of Energy (DOE). The America COMPETES Act (PDF 39 KB), signed into law in August of 2007, codified many of the recommendations in the National Academies report. Authorized but without an initial budget, ARPA-E received $400 million funding in April 2009 through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). ARPA-E is modeled after the successful Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the agency responsible for technological innovations such as the Internet and the stealth technology found in the F117A and other modern fighter aircraft. Specifically, ARPA-E was established and charged with the following objectives:

1. To bring a freshness, excitement, and sense of mission to energy research that will attract many of the U.S.’s best and brightest minds—those of experienced scientists and engineers, and, especially, those of students and young researchers, including persons in the entrepreneurial world; 

2. To focus on creative “out-of-the-box” transformational energy research that industry by itself cannot or will not support due to its high risk but where success would provide dramatic benefits for the nation; 

3. To utilize an ARPA-like organization that is flat, nimble, and sparse, capable of sustaining for long periods of time those projects whose promise remains real, while phasing out programs that do not prove to be as promising as anticipated; and 

4. To create a new tool to bridge the gap between basic energy research and development/industrial innovation. 

 

August 13, 2010

Vote NO on Measure 1

In the August primary election, Alaskans will vote on Ballot Measure 1, a poorly worded initiative brought to Alaska by a wealthy Libertarian activist from New York.  We think you should Vote No on 1 for many reasons.

Signature-gatherers collected names by calling it an “anti corruption” act at a time in Alaska’s history, 2007, when corruption in the Alaska Legislature was a daily feature on the news and Alaskans were understandably fed up with business-as-usual in Juneau.

But don’t be fooled by fancy words or the out-of-state interests that brought this initiative to Alaska.  Ballot Measure 1 is an attempt to silence local voices in Juneau.

Rural Alaska communities are especially threatened by this initiative.

This measure will outlaw municipal-funded lobbying.   In other words, local governments could not use public funds to hire staff or contract with a lobbyist to advocate for needs in their area.  Communities need to be strong in advocating for local interests.  It takes time and persistence to educate members of the Legislature on the unique needs of rural Alaska, which is why they use lobbyists. But if this measure passes, communities will be shut out of the legislative process and left out in the cold when it comes to much-needed funding for community projects.  Funds would go to larger communities with more representation while leaders of small communities and villages would likely be unable to afford to travel to Juneau out of their own pockets, as the initiative requires.

Ballot Measure 1 will also cut you and your family out of the political process and further silence the voices of individual rural Alaskans.  How?  It prohibits any Alaskan who does more than $500 of business with the state, city or village from making political contributions.  Many of the folks affected are Alaskan-owned small and medium-sized businesses.  To make it worse, the ban extends to the contract holders’ “immediate” family, including any “spouse, child, spouse’s child, son-in law, daughter-in-law, parent, sibling, grandparent, grandchild, stepbrother, stepsister, stepparent, parent-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, guardian, and domestic partner.”  That is quite a list!

Measure 1 also takes aim at Alaska non-profits.  According to the language, board members and officers of nonprofits who receive city or state funds to support their work in our communities will lose their right to support candidates just for serving on the board.  And again, the “immediate family” members of these volunteers would also be silenced.
 
The Alaska Attorney General and the Alaska Legislative Affairs’ Legal Services office have both issued opinions saying the initiative would likely be struck down as unconstitutional.  If Ballot Measure 1 passes, the state will be forced to defend it in the courts at taxpayer expense.  These funds could be better spent on public safety, transportation or education.   A similar initiative was just ruled unconstitutional in Colorado.

Our opponents call this “Clean and Open Government.”  We call it ridiculous.  We encourage you to read the language in the initiative and make the call yourself.  You too will find that the proponents have gone too far and are trying to quash the rights of individuals and their families, businesses, communities and non-profits. 

Please read all 1,967 words of Measure #1 at www.StopTheGagLaw.com and ask yourself if you understand all of its potential impacts.

Please Vote NO on Measure 1.

Paid for and approved by Alaska Conservation Voters, Jamie Kenworthy, Chair. 810 N Street Anchorage, AK 99501. The top three contributors to ACV are Paul Brainerd (Seattle, WA), Walt Parker (Anchorge, AK) and Steven Compton (Anchorage, AK).

 

August 6th, 2010

Clean and Renewable Energy: Good for the Economy?

Most conservationists tout the idea that clean and renewable energy is good for the environment, that it saves us from the evils of coal and drilling.  What seems to be less discussed is the fact that in addition to helping the environment, clean and renewable energy is good business as well.  We’ve shown you previously on this blog how making small lifestyle changes in your own household can save your family money but what does clean and renewable energy mean for the economy as a whole? 

According to ‘A Sportsmen’s Guide to Clean Energy’ by Resource Media, the renewable energy sector generates more jobs than the fossil-fuel industry per unit of energy, with wind energy producing two to three times more jobs than coal or gas development.  This same guide shows that electricity produced by wind energy is cheaper than natural gas produced electricity and, in some case, comparable to energy from coal-fired plants.  It’s also important to note that fossil-fuel produced energy keeps getting more expensive while, as the technology advances, clean and renewable energy prices are dropping. Many forms of renewable energy like hydro and geothermal, are stably priced and not subject to the same market fluctuations as other less-clean energy sources.

Alaskans want cheaper energy, more jobs, and a clean environment.  Luckily, the clean and renewable energy sector is able to deliver on all three.  Alaskans care deeply about our wildlife and habitat but we all need to work and to heat our homes.  Investing in clean and renewable energy allows us the luxury of not having to choose between the two.

August 5th, 2010

Citizens get a chance to talk energy with Senator Mark Begich

On Tuesday, July 27th, a representative of Alaska Conservation Alliance joined a small group of concerned citizens from Anchorage, Point Hope, and Barrow to speak with Sen. Mark Begich, D – Alaska, about the future of energy policy in America. Sen. Begich has been part of the introduction of the Shore Act, which, if enacted, would promote some renewable energy ventures while focusing on holding companies like BP responsible in a larger way when disasters like the Deepwater Horizon spill occur. This was a valuable opportunity to voice the concerns of the conservation community, and we were lucky to be present.

The general feeling of the meeting seemed to be that while the public can’t count on Congress to hold BP and other non-environmentally sound companies like it fully accountable for the damage they’ve done, we can expect improvements in terms of regionally-based oversight in both Alaska and the Gulf and higher liability caps. Hopefully this type of legislation paves the way for a world in which development is always conducted with the input of those closest to it, and where care is taken to prevent tragedies that don’t need to happen.

Friday, July 30th, 2010

Conservation Community meets with EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson

Earlier this week, leaders from Alaska's conservation community had the honor of meeting with EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson.  Administrator Jackson, who is visiting Alaska for the first time, is on a tour of the state to learn about conservation and resource extraction issues.   

The discussion touched on a wide range of Alaskan topics on which the EPA has traditionally played a role.  From coal ash disposal and pesticides regulation to greenhouse gas emissions requirements and clean water standards, conservation leaders advocated on a wide variety of issues important to Alaskans.  Administrator Jackson was responsive to all issues, indicating this was an opportunity to learn directly from those working in the state. 

Administrator Jackson spent the next few days in Dillingham and Bethel, exploring views on the proposed Pebble Mine and other conservation and sanitation concerns.  Special thanks to Marcia Combs, Alaska Liaison for Region 10 Administrator for all of her hard work and assistance in facilitating the meeting with Administrator Jackson. 

 

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Why is the future of the Knik Arm Bridge about to move to the next session of the legislature?

Because of a fact that has yet to be reported in the media. Both financial scenarios that the Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority (KABATA) quietly gave to the Department of Revenue on March 23, 2010 require state support.  In the first, the state just finances the $686 million Phase I project itself and the legislature would have to annually appropriate the necessary revenue to cover the bond payments on the debt payments that the toll revenue cannot cover.  In the second scenario, a private partner would put up 9% of the expected costs (and get 64% of the projected return) with the state guaranteeing through a letter of credit the annual payments to the private partner to cover the expected toll shortfall.

But wasn’t the Bridge supposed to be a Public Private Partnership with no further state support than the original $114 million in state and federal funds?  Well that was the story KABATA told community councils last spring and broadcast on radio ads the year before.  And with some vague hedging, that what was the story KABATA told the Anchorage Assembly on March 16, 2010 and AMATS (the transportation decision-making body for Anchorage) nine days later when AMATS with the support of Mayor Sullivan’s vote and state representatives kept the Bridge in the short term funding list.  

At both the Assembly and AMATS meetings, public representatives asked for a simple spread sheet showing how the project was financially feasible with no further state support required.  That March 23 Department of Revenue spread sheet was never produced and only recently came to light after a public records request.  An earlier version of Bridge finances, using KABATA’s estimate on costs and the federal estimate of revenue, shows that bridge deficits in the first 10 years of operation would  approximately be equal to the $24 million/year either Anchorage or the Mat Su Borough receive in total state and federal transportation funding – that’s roads, public transportation, bikeways, and potholes combined.  See www.knikbridgefacts.org for the full spread sheet numbers.

KABATA’s basic problem, and why Juneau is now in their sights, is too few trips to support such a costly bridge. Besides avoiding a $5 one way car toll, the Glenn is a shorter route to Anchorage for folks living in Palmer and Wasilla.  So their optimistic revenue projections have to assume a 2030 Mat Su population of 250,000 to approach alleged financial feasibility.  

The Mat Su population today is approximately 85,000.  The number that the University of Alaska’s Institute of Social and Economic Research uses for Mat Su in 2030 is 169,000 and that is the number used to model the now stalled Highway to Highway project.  

But the ISER number was too low to produce the trips and resulting toll revenue necessary for KABATA’s financial plan so a Texas firm, Global Insights Research, was then hired to come up with the 250,000 population figure KABATA uses to try to demonstrate financial feasibility.  For Mat Su to have 250,000 by 2030 means the Borough would have to add the population of Palmer, the Borough’s second largest city, to the Borough every year for the next 20 years.  

Before the AMATS Policy Committee voted on the Bridge project, the AMATS Technical Committee highlighted the overestimated population number for the Policy Committee. But the Policy Committee ignored that issue when they decided not to move the project to the long term plan.   Those opposed to the Bridge are now asking the state Department of Transportation and the Governor to have KABATA rerun the revenue numbers with the realistic 169,000 number that ISER uses for the 2030 Mat Su Borough population.

This fall will see significant backroom maneuvering on two unresolved issues that must be settled prior to the Bridge getting a Record of Decision on the Environmental Impact Statement.  The National Marine Fisheries Service has not yet signed off on the Bridge design because the threat the gravel-filled causeway design could pose to the Cook Inlet beluga and salmon populations.  And the construction of Port McKenzie and the causeway design may exacerbate the siltation issues that already affect large ships coming into Knik Arm to the expanding Port of Anchorage.

If either the beluga or siltation issues cannot be resolved, the existing cheaper 8,200 foot causeway design moves to a 14,000 foot span and Bridge costs move from the current stratospheric level to deep space.  

Bottom line, when legislative candidates come to your door this summer and fall, ask if they support further state funds for the Bridge or a state revenue guarantee for Bridge bonds which will quickly turn into the same thing.  My conservative estimate is that even with the cheaper 8,200 foot span, Bridge deficits will over time come close to a billion dollar cumulative deficit.  Even for Alaska’s state government, that’s real money and we’re likely to need those funds for other priorities.  

Jamie Kenworthy is Chair of the Board of Alaska Conservation Voters.  This column represents his own opinion and not that of Alaska Conservation Voters.

It’s the year 2035 and Alaska is home to many miles of coniferous forests, net-busting catches of wild salmon, good wages, interesting work, fall hunts and one-of-a-kind cultures. Alaska 2035 sounds like a good place to live.

As in most times, 2035 Alaska is a mix of enormous natural beauty and the evidence of man’s creative drive to test boundaries and overcome challenges. If Alaska is as bountiful a quarter century from now as it is today, how was this bounty achieved and paid for? A good start was the passage of clean energy legislation in the spring of 2010.

Some History
The passage of Senate Bill 220, the Alaska Sustainable Energy Act, and House Bill 306, the State Energy Policy, marked a turning point in Alaska’s years-long progress on renewable energy and energy efficiency.

As little as five months before the bills were passed into law, it was by no means certain that Alaska would act in time to realize its full potential in the clean energy economy – or even provide its residents with home-grown energy! Dated electrical generation strategies, Cook Inlet’s dwindling stockpiles natural gas, the volatility of fossil fuel prices and impending carbon costs were sparking debate about diversifying Alaska’s energy portfolio. Yet there was no plan for where Alaska wanted to go, or how it was going to get there. Coal-fired power plants can operate for 50 years or more and hydroelectric projects routinely outlive the century mark - the energy decisions Alaskans made in the young millennium’s first decade are still affecting the Alaska of 2035.

With strong energy efficiency provisions to ensure wise energy use, as well as the Emerging Energy Technology Fund promoting innovation, Alaska is closer than ever to achieving our vision of a sustainable energy future. Together, the state's Energy Policy and Sustainable Energy Act set the goals and created the incentives that we needed to get to where we are today.

The Railbelt Elecricity Efficiency Landscape (REEL) Report, released in 2010, conservatively estimated that at least a $1 billion in economic activity and 10,000 jobs could come from a growing clean energy economy by 2025. This kind of sustainable development, as well as the natural riches of Alaska’s natural gas reserves and the construction of the Trans-Alaska Oil Pipeline, made our state a leader in energy innovation. Alaska’s citizens own the state's resources; through smart and measured development we have been their beneficiaries.
With all the money saved on fuel through energy efficiency measures, Alaskan families can afford a well-deserved vacation. 

Their destinations might include a trip along the Inside Passage to Juneau, the Kenai Peninsula, Fairbanks, Chena Hot Springs, Denali and Arctic Alaska. Let’s follow one of these journeys, and along the way we’ll see what’s changed – and what’s stayed the same – since these landmark pieces of legislation were passed.

Read More.....

Monday, June 21st, 2010

REAP's 2nd Annual Business of Clean Energy in Alaska Conference!

The Renewable Energy Alaska Project (REAP) hosted its second annual Business of Clean Energy in Alaska conference last week and the event was dynamite!  Featuring speakers from Alaska and around the world, presenters focused on the economic benefits of renewable energy generation, energy efficiency, job creation and opportunities for growing these sector in Alaska.  As REAP notes in their agenda, “The cleantech sector, including renewable energy technology and generation, accounted for about 25% of all private sector venture capital investment in 2009 – more than software, biotech or any other category.”  Check out REAP’s website for more information: http://alaskarenewableenergy.org/events/conference-business-of-clean-energy-in-alaska/.

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

It’s official – House Bill 306, the Statewide Energy Policy bill, and Senate Bill 220, the Sustainable Energy Act, were both signed into law by Governor Parnell yesterday afternoon at the Dena’ina Center.  And man does that feel good! 

Both bills are a big step in the right direction for Alaska.  They set goals for renewable energy and energy efficiency, provide a vision for the state and setup the specific programs and funding to start moving towards those goals. For more specifics on the bill, please visit Alaska Conservation Voters’ Conservation Watch:  http://acvoters.org/legislative-session/conservation-watch/conservation-watch-28-4-20-2010.  And check out photos below from the event!

"This legislation sets in statute a state energy policy to meet Alaska's current and future energy needs," said Governor Sean Parnell.

"Alaska now has an energy roadmap," said Rep. Millett. "HB 306 creates an overarching energy policy for the legislature, the governor, power producers, and Alaskans, and it will be used to guide decisions about energy for generations to come."

"Weatherizing 25 percent of the state's most inefficient buildings across the state, we estimated the state can save $3 million per year," said Sen. Bill Wielechowski of the Sustainable Energy Act. 

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

Energy at the National Women's Leadership Summit by our own Caitlin Higgins

At the National Women’s Leadership Summit held last week in Anchorage, our own Sen. Murkowski said it best.  “This forum is a unique opportunity for us to address the serious challenges confronting our nation and develop sound, sustainable policies that also safeguard our security and strengthen the economy. I can think of no better place to hold the summit than our nation’s last frontier, a place critical to America’s path forward on energy and the environment.”
The summit focused on energy and what different investments and different tracks might mean for nation’s overall energy future.  With the oil spill crisis in the Gulf of Mexico, rising energy costs, national security issues and Alaska being an energy state, energy as a topic was not only timely, but very relevant to most people’s daily lives.  I was fortunate enough to be a panelist at the National Women’s Leadership Summit and I was struck by the energy savvy of the different women in attendance.  These summit participants were all intelligent, dedicated, respectful of all opinions, professional and resourceful, and I want to thank them for the differing perspectives they brought to the table of what a better energy future really means and how we get there.  As a representative of a conservation organization, I advocated for stronger energy efficiency practices first and foremost, followed by greater investments in renewable energy technology.  Others saw a larger role for traditional fossil fuels and new technological developments in that field, though everyone agreed that clean energy generation needs to become a larger part of our energy portfolio. 

In spite of the different opinions on which energy track to take, our energy future seems to come down to a not-so-simple choice: what do we want?  As one of my fellow panelists astutely pointed out, there’s no magic switch that will transition our nation away from the energy sources of yesterday, it will take time and a dedicated effort.  We all know the reasons to transition away from fossil fuels - security and energy independence, health issues like mercury emissions and asthma, CO2 emissions which contribute to climate change, water contamination and safety issues in terms of fuel extraction and combustion.  Fossil fuels are very water intensive and because there has to be a constant fuel source, over the long run fossil fuels will be more expensive.  They are also likely to incur additional expenses from carbon taxes.  And finally, despite improving the efficiency of our fossil fuel use, the bottom line is that they will eventually run out.  These are limited energy sources and from an investment standpoint, it makes much more sense to put resources into energy sources that are by far cleaner, allows us to be more energy independent, improves our national security, are more stably priced, cheaper over the long run and of course, renewable.  

This isn’t to say that a transition to greater energy efficiency and renewable energy use doesn’t have hurdles to be overcome, such as accessibility, storage and supply continuity – the wind doesn’t always blow and the sun doesn’t always shine.  But the tides are steady, the earth’s core holds its temperature and enhanced transmission capacity and battery storage can help ensure that energy supplies are more constant.  Doesn’t it make the most sense to invest in solving these problems instead of investing in new technology to help us get to the last remaining and most difficult to reach fossil fuel reserves which still have other negative consequences?  Especially when so many different companies, entrepreneurs, NGO’s and villages right here in Alaska and around the world and spurring new innovations, creating jobs, saving money and making money while doing it.   

If we do choose clean energy it won’t be a 100% transition, because even the most optimistic projections include some fossil fuel use into the foreseeable future.  Yet we have the capacity to make a dramatic, measurable shift in reducing our energy use through efficiencies and the vast majority of our new energy coming from clean sources.  Incentives, initiatives, mandates, financing options, best business practices and personal choices can all play a part and America should be the leader of this burgeoning new sector.  Of all the different opinions and perspectives at the National Women’s Leadership Summit, we all did agree that greater efficiency and renewable energy use was a good thing.  Why not choose to invest in more of a good thing. 

 

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Conservation Community Meets with Senator Begich

Senator Mark Begich met with several members of the Alaska Conservation Alliance last Tuesday to talk about both state and national environmental issues.  A variety of groups representing public health, local communities and conservation organizations were on hand and discussions ranged from climate change and public transportation to toxic substances control, the Gulf of Mexico oil spill crisis and fisheries management.  Alliance member groups found common ground with the Senator on several issues and as the topic turned to the offshore drilling in Alaska, Senator Begich argued strongly in favor of opening Alaska’s coastal waters.  While not all of the Alliance member groups may agree with this position, there is consensus that any offshore drilling in our state would face unique arctic challenges and must be done with the strongest environmental standards possible.  Thank you Senator Begich and staff for the opportunity to meet and talk about conservation issues.

Friday, June 4th, 2010

After months of deliberation, the state legislature capital budget included a $50 million allocation to carry out the third round of grants in the Renewable Energy Fund.  Created three years ago, the Fund supports renewable energy projects around rural and urban Alaska.  The first rounds have funded wind farms, wind-diesel projects, hydropower development, and other power generation, while creating hundreds of jobs.  In a year with high oil prices and an energy shortage looming in the Railbelt, Governor Sean Parnell Thursday cut legislature appropriated funding for renewable energy in Alaska by half from $50 to $25 million.

Governor Parnell touted his tendency toward fiscal conservatism in explaining the $25 million cut. With the Renewable Energy Fund veto and other budget appropriations that were cut, the governor plans to save money for future use in Alaska.  Although wisely spending state money should always be a priority, Gov. Parnell's decision leaves much room for debate.  The Renewable Energy Fund creates jobs, reduces energy dependence by diversifying Alaska's portfolio, and protects the environment.  With Alaskan unemployment rates and energy prices hovering at their highest levels in years, the choice to reduce renewable spending now has been questioned by many Alaskans.  Please see the Alaska state website at gov.state.ak.us for more information on the 2011 budget and Governor Parnell's tough decisions.

 

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

In a sunny ceremony attended by prominent legislators and energy producers yesterday at Kincaid Park, Anchorage, Governor Sean Parnell signed two important pieces of legislation aimed at increasing private sector investment in Alaska's clean energy network.  By committing SB 243 and SB 277 to law, Alaska has taken two more steps toward meeting its goals of 50% electric generation from renewable resources by 2025.

Senate Bill 277 exempts certain renewable energy projects from oversight by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska and municipalities.  The bill emerged in response to findings that highly regulated markets present a barrier to entry for renewable energy providers.  Sponsored by the Senate Energy Committee, the legislation aims to find the middle ground of protecting Alaskan ratepayers while encouraging renewable development to meet the state's growing energy needs.

Senate Bill 243, sponsored by Senator Lesil McGuire, deals specifically with geothermal resource development.  Alaska previously had the nation's highest geothermal royalty rate, which translated to low levels of development, energy generation, and state revenue.  The new law will set the state rate to be commensurate with federal levels, encouraging geothermal exploration at sites like Mt. Spur and others that have the potential to provide clean power for thousands of Alaskan citizens, urban and rural.

Both of these bills demonstrate ways the state government can work to promote clean energy solutions for a sustainable future, and Alaskans should be proud of this progress and expect the trend toward affordable clean energy to continue.

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

ACV Parties!

Alaska Conservation Voters is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization and the political voice for the conservation community.  What a lot of people don’t know is that the Board members and staff of Voters are, well, party animals.  ACV is hosting parties every few weeks in communities across Alaska, and we’re not talking granola and drum circles (though granola is tasty). 

Instead, Voters parties are relaxed, engaging affairs hosted by ACV members in your community with wine and hors d'oeuvres where conservation advocates can meet, talk about politics and elected officials, have fun, engage on conservation issues, meet new people and have fun.  Join us at one of our upcoming events and check back to see future events as they are scheduled.  If you would like to host a Voters party in your neck of the woods, contact us, we can’t wait!  alora@akvoice.org, (907) 258-6160.  Help Alaska Conservation Voters turn conservation values into state priorities.  We’ll see you at the party. 

Coming Soon:

ACV Fish Fry!  The exact date is TBA (we’re thinking mid-June) but we’ll have details soon on this delicious Anchorage event!   

Details soon on events in Anchorage, Fairbanks, Homer and more….

Friday, May 21, 2010

10:45AM--Conservation Leaders Meet with EPA Administrator Dennis McLerran

Last week leaders from Alaska's conservation community had the distinct privilege of meeting with EPA Regional Administrator Dennis McLerran. 

Organized by Cook Inletkeeper Executive Director Bob Shavelson and ACA Executive Director Caitlin Higgins, the meeting was the first with Mr. McLerran since he took the position this year.  Leaders from Alaska's environmental community attended the meeting which included other high level EPA officials.

The discussion broached a wide range of Alaskan topics on which the EPA has traditionally played a role.  From agricultural chemicals, to coal dust, to offshore drilling regulations, Alaska's conservation spokespeople presented their wide-ranging concerns for the good of the state.  Discussion was lively and open, as Mr. McLerran and his colleagues addressed each issue with a description of current protocol and future possibilities from the perspective of the federal office.

During the brief meeting Mr. McLerran spoke of a longtime affinity for Alaska and his many northern adventures by kayak and over land.  He was generally responsive to the concerns brought to the table, and expressed enthusiasm to work together with the greater conservation community in Alaska to protect citizen's health and the state's wild places.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

1:30PM--Conservation Community Convenes for our sister organization, ACA's End of Session Meeting

Much of Alaska's conservation community gathered in Anchorage last week to celebrate a successful legislative session, evaluate performances, and deliberate future strategies.  The Alaska Conservation Alliance played host for the series of meetings, but much of the program was presented by the leaders in attendance from around the state.

An online communications workshop sponsored by Polly Carr and the Alaska Conservation Foundation was widely regarded as one of the most constructive sessions of the week. Michael Sharp, Communications Director for Cook Inletkeeper, presented web strategies and social media principles.  Not afraid to shoot straight, Sharp pointed out gaps in the conservation community's e-world and even more, pointed the way towards strategic development with an enthusiasm that no doubt sent attendees back to their offices with some hacking ahead of them.

Caitlin Higgins, Executive Director of the Alliance, led the traditional End of Session discussion around the theme of collective potential.  Toward that theme, leaders like Pam Miller of Alaska Community Action on Toxics and Emily Fehrenbacher of the Sierra Club presented successful methods for organizing and linking with non-traditional partners.  Framing the discussion around successes from the past year and overarching conservation goals, Caitlin pointed out ways to increase capacity from the community's statewide base.

Attendees also had the privilege of guest speakers Senator Lesil McGuire and Senator Bill Wielechowski.  Champions of pivotal conservation legislation during the 2010 session, the senators reflected that the year's successes represented a paradigm shift for energy and environmental policies in Alaska.  The veteran legislators shared stories from the trenches and gave their insight on how to best transcend traditional images and party norms to create positive state policy in the future.

The meetings also included discussion around the upcoming conservation priorities selection process for the 27th legislative session.  Looking forward, the community has a lot of momentum to utilize with the political scene ever-evolving and another session only months away.  The room had an optimistic tone as the event was concluded and the crowd filed out, headed back to work to keep Alaska great.

 

Thursday, April 22, 2010

2:02 PM -- Happy Earth Day Everybody!

Read more about the 26th Legislative Session in the Wrap-up edition of the Conservation Watch.

Released today!

 

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

3:31 PM -- Sign up for the Conservation Watch

For a conservation-eye recap on the 26th Alaska State Legislature, sign up to receive the final Conservation Watch of the session.

Thank you for reading the Conservation Blog throughout the last 90 days. Keep checking in for regular updates about Alaska's environmental issues, events and campaigns.

 

Sunday, April 18, 2010

4:45 PM -- Priority Bill SUCCESS

SB 220 Alaska Sustainable Energy Act and HB 306 State Energy Policy pass the House and Senate respectively. SB 220 is now transmitted to the Governor and HB 306 awaits concurrence.

 

 

Saturday, April 17, 2010

11:59 AM -- Environmental Priority Update

Senate Bill 220 Alaska Sustainable Energy Act is scheduled to be heard on the House Floor today. Floor session is to begin at Noon.

 

House Bill 306 State Energy Policy passed Senate Finance this morning. Senate Finance was its final referred committee.

Thank you to Reps. Charisse Millett, Bryce Edgmon and the House Energy Committee members for their work on this important legislation.

 

Friday, April 16, 2010

7:35 PM -- Environmental Victories!

Senate Bill 243 Geothermal Resource: Royalty / Permit / Fee passed the House today with a vote of 27 Yes to Zero No with 13 Absent.

House Bill 20 Fisheries Loans: Energy Efficiency / Amount Passed the Senate today with a vote of 19 Yes to Zero No with one Absent. Upon Concurrence the bill will be transmitted to the Governor to sign into law.

 

11:02 AM -- Today's Floor Votes

House Floor

SB 243 Geothermal Resouce: Royalty / Permit / Fee

SB 277 Public Utility Exemption: Renewable Energy

Senate Floor

SB 309 Gas Exploration / Development tax credit

HB 20 Fisheries Loans: Energy Efficiency / Amount

 

10:33 AM -- Geothermal Royalty UPDATE

During a long day of bill hearings, the House Finance Committee took up and passed Senate Bill 243, a bill to promote geothermal resource development in Alaska. It is scheduled to be heard on the House Floor today.

Amidst lengthy bill discussions and a few passionately contested issues, SB 243 saw no obstruction and appeared to have wide support. The legislation will bring Alaska's geothermal royalty rate, currently the highest in the nation, down to that charged by the federal government. It also sets up statutory oversight regulations for the geothermal industry.

The decrease will promote development in a relatively untapped industry of huge potential here in the state.  Thus far the royalty rate has been a major barrier to entry. The legislature hopes that large scale projects such as the proposed 50MW Mt. Spurr geothermal plant will now move forward, easing Alaska's energy needs while bringing in some royalties to the state government.

The bill received four new co-sponsors in House Finance: Representatives Les Gara, Mike Hawker, Joe Thomas, and Anna Fairclough.

 

9:35 AM -- Legislation UPDATE

House Bill 20 up today for vote on the Senate Floor

HB 20 FISHERIES LOANS:ENERGY EFFICIENCY/AMOUNT: an Act relating to commercial fishing loans for energy efficiency upgrades and increasing the maximum amount for certain loans under the Commercial Fishing Loan Act; and providing for an effective date. ACV has a letter of support filed for this bill. The bill has changed some since first introduced. The loans available to Alaska fishermen, up to $400,000, are to be used for Energy Efficiency upgrades to vessel engines. Vessel hulls are no longer included.

The bill is sponsored by Reps. Bryce Edgmon, Bob Buch, Alan Austerman, Joe Thomas, Peggy Wilson, Cathy Munoz, Kyle Johansen, Beth Kerttula, Paul Seaton, Les Gara, Chris Tuck, Bob Lynn. And Senators Lyman Hoffman, Bert Stedman, Fred Dyson, Linda Menard.

 

HCR 22 up today in Senate Finance Committee in Senate Finance Rm 532. The meeting started at 9:00 AM [Passed (S) Finance Committee at 9:36 AM without objection]

HCR 22 ALASKA NORTHERN WATERS TASK FORCE: Establishing and relating to the Alaska Northern Waters Task Force. The bill is sponsored by (H) Community and Regional Affairs Committee. The bill has been well received.

 

8:03 AM -- Environmental Priority UPDATE

Last night the House Finance Committee heard and held Senate Bill 220 Alaska Sustainable Energy Act. It was the bill's first hearing in (H) Finance. Sens. Lesil McGuire and Bill Wielechowski introduced the bill to the committee members, taking time to thank their staff Michael Pawlowski and Michelle Sydeman for their hard work on the bill.

The bill is expected to be heard again this morning for discussion of at least five amendments.

One of these amendments (#4), proposed by Reps. Les Gara and Joe Thomas, would strengthen the bill's energy efficiency provisions by adding a new section to AS 44.42: Retrofits and new construction for energy efficiency; energy efficiency report.

Another amendment (#3) by Gara and Thomas would allow the Dept. of Administration to consider energy efficient equipment when purchasing equipment that uses energy.

A third amendment (#5) would allow the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation and the Alaska Energy Authority to "promote energy conservation, energy efficiency, and alternative energy through training and public education."

House Finance Committee is scheduled to begin at 8:30 AM today in House Finance Rm 519.

Visit us on Twitter For up the minute reports on the progress of SB 220 and other conservation bills.

 

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Tax Day

1:31 PM -- HJR 40 Cook Inlet / Kachemak Beluga Population Passed the Senate today with 20 Yes votes.

SCS CSHJR 40(RES): opposing the proposed designation by the National Marine Fisheries Service of 3,000 square miles of upper Cook Inlet, the mid-inlet, all of the inlet's western shores, and Kachemak Bay as critical habitat for beluga whales.

Sponsors: Representatives Charisse Millett, Mark Neuman, Bob Lynn, Johnson, Wes Keller, Carl Gatto, Olson, Bill Stoltze, Kyle Johansen. And Senators Fred Dyson, Thomas Wagoner, Con Bunde, Lesil McGuire, Kevin Meyer, Bert Stedman, Charlie Huggins, Linda Menard.

 

12:25 PM -- Legislation UPDATE

Senate Bill 220 Alaska Sustainable Energy Act was scheduled to be heard in the 8:30 AM House Finance Committee meeting today. The committee faced a busy schedule. The bill was not heard this morning.

(H) Finance is scheduled to meet at 1:45 PM to continue the morning meeting.

 

House Bill 36 Initiatives contributions was scheduled to be heard at 8:30 AM in Senate Judiciary Committee. The hearing was postponed.

 

House Concurrent Resolution 22 Alaska Northern Waters Task Force was scheduled to be heard in Senate Finance today at 9:00 AM. Time constraints and a full schedule postponed the Resolution's hearing until at least 1:45 PM today.

 

ACV Environmental Priorities:

House Bill 306 State Energy Policy is currently in Senate Finance Committee. It is not scheduled for a hearing.

 

Senate Bill 152 Regional Transit Authority is currently in Senate Finance. It is not scheduled for a hearing.

 

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

1:04 PM -- Alaska Coastal Management Program UPDATE

The debate over a plan to manage Alaska's coastline was taken up again in the Senate Finance Committee on Tuesday afternoon.  A new committee substitute for SB 4 Alaska Coastal Management Program & Alaska Coastal Policy Board, which provides new guidelines for the Alaska Coastal Management Plan, was presented by staff to bill sponsor Sen. Donny Olson.

The bill calls for more local oversight to ensure rural communities have a voice in the management of the land that supports their way of life.  The Committee Substitute presented Tuesday gave considerable power back to the state in an effort to compromise with those who opposed the bill for delegating too much power to individual communities on issues that have statewide influence.

Randy Bates, Director of the Department of Natural Resources opposed those changes.  His approach was rebuked by Senator Hoffman, who admonished DNR for appearing to stall the process.  With only five days left legislators showed urgency in their work and disappointment at those who would slow the bill.

"You get to pick your own team", Hoffman told Bates, referring to an amendment that allows the governor to appoint all nine members of the Coastal Policy Board.  "We dealt you a winning hand - that's the ultimate, and it still isn't good enough.  That tells me you don't want to do anything."

Bates maintained that the state agency could still not support legislation that gave local authorities purview and veto power on issues of state interest.  The Senate Finance Committee members, a majority of whom represent coastal districts, asked that DNR respond with constructive comments on the bill by noon on Wednesday.

Bates was followed by the Department of Environmental Conservation and the Department of Law who also expressed continued opposition to the bill.  They too were asked by the committee to submit proposed, constructive changes by Wednesday.

The bill is expected to be brought up for further deliberation in Senate Finance after the receipt of those comments, possibly as early as Wednesday afternoon.

 

12:06 PM -- Bill UPDATE

House Bill 306 State Energy Policy was not heard today in Senate Finance Committee. It is expected to be heard in that committee tomorrow.

 

HB 36: Initiatives: Contributions / Procedures was heard, amended and held today in Senate Judiciary Committee. (S) Judiciary has scheduled another hearing for the bill for Thursday at 8:30 AM in Butrovich Rm 205.

 

SB 312 Vessel Passenger Tax passed Senate Finance today and was placed on the bottom of the Senate Calendar.

Vote:

• Do Pass: Sens. Lyman Hoffman, Bert Stedman
• No Recommendation: Sens. Charlie Huggins, Joe Thomas, Dennis Egan, Johnny Ellis, Donald Olson

 

Still to come...

(H)Labor & Commerce Standing Committee
Wednesday at 3:15 PM in Barnes Rm 124
SB 243 Geothermal Resource: Royalty / Permit / Fee
SB 277 Public Utility Exemption: Renewable Energy

(S)Resources Standing Committee
Wednesday at 3:30 PM in Butrovich Rm 205
HJR 45 Oppose Federal Cap And Trade Legislation
HJR 49 Opposing EPA Clean Air Act Regulations
HB 70 Alaska Grown Agricultural Products

 

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

4:36 PM -- Bills up Tomorrow

HB 306: State Energy Policy has been scheduled for a hearing in Senate Finance Committee at 9:00 AM in Senate Finance Rm 532

+ Other Bills scheduled to be heard in Senate Finance:
Wednesday at 9:00 AM in Senate Finance Rm 532
SB 312 Vessel Passenger Tax
SB 309 Gas Exploration \ Development Tax Credit
HB 280 Natural Gas: Storage / Tax Credits

HB 36: Initiatives: Contributions / Procedures has been scheduled for a meeting in Senate Judiciary Committee at 8:30 AM in Butrovich Rm 205

(H)Labor & Commerce Standing Committee
Wednesday At 3:15 Pm In Barnes Rm 124
SB 243 Geothermal Resource: Royalty / Permit / Fee
SB 277 Public Utility Exemption: Renewable Energy

(S)Resources Standing Committee
Wednesday At 3:30 Pm In Butrovich Rm 205
HJR 45 Oppose Federal Cap And Trade Legislation
HJR 49 Opposing Epa Clean Air Act Regulations
HB 70 Alaska Grown Agricultural Products

 

7:35 AM -- Today's Bills to Watch

(S)Finance Standing Committee 9:00 AM in Senate Finance Rm 532

• HB 20 Fisheries Loans: Energy Efficiency / Amount
• HB 306 State Energy Policy

 

Senate Judiciary Standing Committee 9:15 AM in Butrovich Rm 205

• HB 36 Initiatives: Contributions / Procedures

Monday, April 12, 2010

9:35 AM -- Big weekend for conservation legislation

Senate Bill 220: Alaska Sustainable Energy Act passed the Senate Saturday afternoon with a unanimous yes vote. The timing allowed the bill to be read on the House Floor and referred to (H) Energy then (H) Finance committees.

SB220 is scheduled to be heard this morning at 10 AM in (H) Energy Committee, Barnes Rm 124.

 

HB 306 State Energy Policy passed (S) Resources Committee Saturday afternoon. It is now referred to (S) Finance Committee.

 

HB 20 Fisheries Loans: Energy Efficiency / Amount was heard and held for the first time in Senate Finance this morning. Bill sponsor, Rep. Bryce Edgmon, presented his bill to the committee.

 

HB 36 Initiatives Contributions Procedures passed the House late in the evening of Sunday, April 11. The vote was 35Y to 5N with No votes from Reps. Sharon Cissna, Harry Crawford, David Guttenberg, Scott Kawasaki, Beth Kerttula

 

HCR 22 Alaska Northern Waters Task Force passed the House on Saturday, April 10 with a unanimous yet vote. The Senate read the bill the first time on Sunday and referred it to (S) Finance. 

Arctic sea ice is depleting, and "the rate of depletion is accelerating...," the resolution reads. This is "altering fish and wildlife habitats" and "is affecting polar route navigation by opening oceans previously frozen year-round..." The opening of the Arctic Ocean has also increased efforts to protect resource interests by other Arctic nations; Russia, Canada, Greenland.

The resolution, sponsored by Community and Regional Affairs committee, should set up a task force to coordinate Alaska and US Arctic interests.

 

Friday, April 09, 2010

5:51 AM -- Priority Legislation UPDATE

SB 220 passes Senate Finance

A new Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 220: Alaska Sustainable Energy Act was introduced in Senate Finance today. CSSB 220 (FIN) Version B was passed unanimously. The bill has passed its two original referred committees, (S) Resources and (S) Finance.

More information on the (S) Finance Committee substitute to come.

 

8:32 AM -- Today in Committee

HCR 22: House Finance Committee is scheduled to hear HCR 22 Alaska Northern Waters Task Force at 9:00 AM in House Finance Rm 519. The resolution passed Community and Regional Affairs committee in late March and heard once already in (H) Finance.

Arctic sea ice is depleting, and "the rate of depletion is accelerating...," the resolution reads. This is "altering fish and wildlife habitats" and "is affecting polar route navigation by opening oceans previously frozen year-round..." The opening of the Arctic Ocean has also increased efforts to protect resource interests by other Arctic nations; Russia, Canada, Greenland.

The resolution, sponsored by Community and Regional Affairs committee, should set up a task force to coordinate Alaksa and US Arctic interests.

 

SB 220: Alaska Sustainable Energy Act. SB220 awaits its next hearing in (S) Finance Committee. The bill was heard in (S) Finance once already, so it could be heard today at either 9:00 AM or 1:30 PM in Senate Finance Rm 532. Keep track of (S) Finance on Twitter or listen at Gavel to Gavel.

 

Thursday, April 08, 2010

3:10 PM -- Paul Honeman WINS!

We are pleased to congratulate Paul Honeman on his well deserved victory.

Honeman decisively won East Anchorage Assembly Seat H with 51 percent of the vote to Adam Trombly's 45 percent and Thomas Purcell's 4 percent.

ACV looks forward to working closely with him on the assembly for the next three years. Susanna Orr, ACV's Political and Outreach Director will be sitting down with him soon to discuss in greater detail ACV's municipal priorities.

READ MORE...

 

 

2:17 PM -- ACV Priority Legislation UPDATE

+ Senate Bill 152: Regional Transit Authorities passed Senate Transportation Committee today with a unanimous vote.

The committee approved an amendment by Sen. Joe Paskavan allowing RTA's to work with the Department of Transportation or Metropolitan Planning Organizations.

The bill, sponsored by Sens. Charlie Huggins, Johnny Ellis and Bettye Davis now moves to Senate Finance.

 

+ Senate Bill 220: Alaska Sustainable Energy Act was not heard today in Senate Finance.

 

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

8:16 AM -- Alaska Conservation Voters is pleased to announce our endorsement of Paul Honeman in the East Anchorage Assembly Race

Paul Honeman (yellow vest) for Anchorage Assembly

We encourage conservation voters living in East Anchorage to VOTE for Paul Honeman in the Tuesday, April 6th 2010 Municipal Election.

For additional information about Paul Honeman, view this profile from the Anchorage Daily News.

Here is some more information about assembly districts and polling places. If you are unable to vote on Tuesday, April 6th between 7:00 am – 8:00 pm at your polling place, please vote early or absentee. Early voting is available at City Hall in Downtown Anchorage. Information about early and special needs voting is available here or by calling (907) 243-8683.

Thanks for voting for Paul Honeman, East Anchorage Assembly.

For more information, please contact Susanna Orr, Political Director for the Alaska Conservation Voters: susanna@akvoice.org

 

Friday, April 02, 2010

12:40 PM -- Week in Review

It was a busy week for natural gas with hearings on at least seven separate gas related bills.

• HCR 2: the Rules Committee added a (H) Finance referral to HCR2. (H) Finance moved SCS CSHCR 2(FIN) Out of Committee
• SB 305 moved out of (S) Finance Committee on the last day of March and passed through the Senate yesterday with only 3 No votes. It is scheduled for a hearing in House Resources on Wednesday, April 7.
• HB 377: (S)L&C: heard and held
• HB 229: (H) FIN: heard and held
• HB 414: (H) RES: heard and held
• SB 309: (S) RES: heard and held. Is scheduled for a hearing in Senate Resources on Monday, April 5.
• HB 369: (S) RES: heard and held

 

Legislators and the public were treated to a presentation in House Finance called "Federal Perspective on the Natural Gas Pipeline," by Larry Persily, Federal Natural Gas Pipeline Coordinator. Persily asked Alaskans to be realistic when contemplating the impact to state coffers of selling Alaska natural gas to the world market. And completion of the complex project won't be easy. However, the benefits to Alaskans of a large diameter pipeline are worth the effort, Persily said.

The U.S. natural gas market is 3X the size of the India, China and Japan markets combined.

"There is the very large U.S. Market. And then there is the LNG market," Persily said.

Persily's commments pointed toward a recommendation to pipe Alaska gas through Canada to the lower 48.

 

Hip hip hooray! Priority bills get their day in Committee

Senate Bill 220: Energy Efficiency / Alternative Energy has another hearing scheduled in Senate Finance, April 5 at 10:00 AM in Senate Finance Rm 532. (S) Finance is the final Senate Committee to which SB 220 was referred.

House Bill 306: State Energy Policy has its first Senate hearing scheduled after passing the House of Representatives on March 17. Senate Resources Committee on Tuesday, April 6 at 3:30 PM in Butrovich Rm 205.

Senate Bill 152: Regional Transit Authority is scheduled to be heard the second time in Senate Transportation Committee on Thursday, April 8 at 1:00 PM in Butrovich Rm 205.

 

Bills to Watch

Senate Bill 143: Railbelt Energy and Transmission Corp was heard in (S) Resources on Thursday April 1. Sen. McGuire and Sen. Wielechowski voted Do Pass and moved CSSB 143(RES) out of Committee

House Bill 182: Railbelt Energy and Transmission Corp was heard and held in (H) Energy Committee on Thursday, April 1.

House Bill 267: Snowmachine use on Dalton Highway was heard and held on March 31.

House Concurrent Resolution 22: Alaska Northern Waters Task Force passed (H) Community and Regional Affairs Committee on Wednesday, March 31. It is scheduled for a hearing on Tuesday, April 6 in (H) Finance.

 

12:33 PM -- Campaign UPDATE

Alaska Conservation Voters is pleased to announce that we have endorsed Paul Honeman in the East Anchorage Assembly Race.

We encourage conservation voters living in East Anchorage to VOTE for Paul Honeman in the Tuesday, April 6th Municipal Election.

For additional information about the candidate, please visit his website www.paulhoneman.com or view this profile from the Anchorage Daily News.

Please click HERE if you need information about assembly districts and polling places. If you are unable to vote on Tuesday, April 6th between 7:00 am – 8:00 pm at your polling place, please vote early or absentee. Early voting is available at City Hall in Downtown Anchorage. Information about early  and special needs voting is available HERE or by calling 907.243. 8683.

Please join me in supporting Paul Honeman for Assembly from East Anchorage!

Susanna Orr, Political Director for the Alaska Conservation Voters

susanna@akvoice.org | 907.209.4398 mobile | 907.258.6130 desk

 

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

4:41 PM -- FY2011 Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Alaska state plan

The Plan was discussed in (H) Community and Regional Affairs (audio) on Tuesday, March 30.

Among many other provisions, the CSBG plan covers energy efficiency and weatherization education and upgrades for low income families.

CSBG funds are allocated to the State for Alaska’s only Community Action Program, RurAL CAP, Inc. The objective of the program is to impact the causes and conditions of poverty.

The State Plan describes how the State administers the program and the activities to be undertaken during the federal fiscal year.

Copies of the Plan will be available at the Fairbanks, Anchorage or Juneau LIO’s or may be requested by contacting Jill Davis, Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development, 211 Cushman, Fairbanks, AK 99701-4639. Phone 907-451-2717.

 

10:36 AM -- Today in the Legislature

HB 267 Snow Machine use in Dalton Highway Corridor

• Today at 1:00 PM in (H)Resources Standing Committee, BARNES Rm 124

 

Annual Address by the Honorable Mark Begich, U.S. Senator

• Today at 11:00 AM in (S)(H)Joint Session, House Chamber

 

Monday, March 29, 2010

11:38 AM -- Legislation to Watch

(H)Community & Regional Affairs Standing Committee
March 30 Tuesday at 8:00 AM in Barnes Rm 124
HCR 22: Alaska Northern Waters Task Force

(S)Finance Standing Committee
March 30 Tuesday at 9:00 AM in Senate Finance Rm 532
SB 4: Coastal Management Program

11:28 AM -- Solar and Wind tower near Indian Alaska

Kayla Spaan’s spots renewable energy sources tower above the town of Indian

Solar and wind power towers like this one found right next to the town of Indian Alaska are examples of how our society might one day treat energy production.

11:11 AM -- Anaktuvuk Pass test home: Arctic living; build it and live in it for less

As Alaskans our lives are framed by rugged climate zones, geographic dispersion, and high fuel costs.  Recently, an Alaskan project comprised of students and teachers, scientists and carpenters, combined traditional wisdom and modern technology to tackle these shared challenges.  Together, they demonstrated a way forward toward sustainable living and lasting economic opportunity.

Anaktuvuk Pass: Population 312.  The village sits above the Arctic Circle in the Brooks Range, where January temperatures average -14 and air travel provides the only access.  It is the last remaining Nunamiut settlement in Alaska.  Exorbitant energy prices make life difficult, and overcrowding has resulted from high construction costs.

Enter the Sustainable Northern Shelters project.  Piloted by the Cold Climate Housing Research Center (CCHRC) in Fairbanks, the program aims to “develop energy efficient and affordable homes that can withstand the extreme climatic conditions of Alaska while reflecting a community’s lifestyle and culture.”   Working with community members and contributing organizations, they have done exactly that.

CCHRC began work in 2008 through meetings with local stakeholders and an on-site forum to ensure community involvement with the project’s design and implementation.

 Through summer and winter the project progressed with laboratory research and testing in Fairbanks, a special course through Ilisagvic College in Barrow for residents wanting to build Northern homes, and continued input from villagers in Anaktuvuk Pass.  Then, in June 2009, with preparations complete and the daylight long, a large and diverse team gathered at the project site and successfully constructed a groundbreaking new model for Arctic living.

The building is simple and smart.  It is positioned to maximize natural light and to minimize the freezing effects of Arctic winds.  Features include a semi-subterranean design, the use of sod for roofing, and a traditional qingok (passive venting system).   It makes use of lightweight steel frames with an interior plywood skin to keep structural weight (and therefore costs) low, and combines a modern soy-based spray foam with an elastomer liner to maximize insulating efficiency.  The Yukon River Inter-Tribal Watershed Council (YRITWC) installed six solar panels and a small amp-air turbine to tap into locally available renewable resources.  The house also uses a water conservation system to maximize usage and minimize waste.

Too good to be true?  The proof is in the numbers.  It was the village’s first new home in ten years, and took only three weeks to build.  Regional new home prices average $1.2 million according the North Slope Housing Bureau, the Anaktuvuk Pass prototype was finished under its $150,000 budget.  Normal houses in the area use 1500 gallons of heating fuel per year.  With its localized solar generator and wind turbine, the experts estimate the prototype’s annual energy consumption at a lowly 110 gallons.

And thanks to high-tech assessment devices, the numbers keep rolling in.  According to Martin Leonard III, Renewable Energy Expert at YRITWC, the prototype is “the most wired home in the arctic.”  Data sets and projections are crucial components of the project, yielding valuable information for the energy and construction fields at any latitude.

In that sense the completed test home is just the beginning.  Perhaps its greatest value lies as a model to be replicated around Alaska and beyond, with existing plans to construct similar homes in Point Lay, Nuiquit, and other Alaskan communities.  In the view of CCHRC President Jack Hebert, “If you can build a sustainable community in Anaktuvuk, you can build a sustainable community anywhere in the world.”  Alaska is demonstrating excellence in the fields of energy efficiency and emerging energy technology, and with continued effort can remain at the forefront to become a leader the world over.

 

Thursday, March 25, 2010

12:14 PM -- Senate Finance heard SB 220 Energy Efficiency / Alternative Energy this morning for the first time. Public testimony was held with 12 testifiers including Caitlin Higgins, Executive Director of Alaska Conservation Alliance and Alaska Conservation Voters. The testimony was overwhelmingly positive with some suggestions to change specific provisions of the bill. Alaskans from Cordova to Nome called in to offer support.

Senate Finance will take SB 220 up again today at 1:30 PM.

 

Friday, March 19, 2010

11:48 AM --  SB 220 Energy Efficiency / Alternative Energy (Alaska Conservation Voters Legislative Priority) has been scheduled for a hearing in Senate Finance on March 25th at 9:00 AM.

No word yet on public testimony.

 

Thursday, March 18, 2010

12:36 PM -- Tune in to Gavel to Gavel at 1:00 PM to hear Senate Bill 152: Regional Transit Authority discussed in (S) Transportation Committee. Public Testimony.

 

12:26 PM -- HB 306 State Energy Policy: An Act declaring a state energy policy. Sponsored by the House Energy Committee. CSHB 306(RES), which passed the House Floor unanimously yesterday afternoon, was referred to Senate Resources then (S) Finance.

Sponsor Statement

 

HJR 45 Oppose Federal Cap And Trade Legislation:   Urging the United States Congress not to enact Cap and Trade legislation. Sponsored by Rep. Bill Stoltze (R)-MatSu/Chugiak, HJR 45 passed through the House yesterday afternoon 31Y to 7N. It was referred to (S) Resources then (S) Finance.

Sponsor Statement

 

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Monday, March 15, 2010

5:27 PM -- House Bill 36 INITIATIVES: CONTRIBUTIONS/ PROCEDURES, Heard and Held until 9 AM Tuesday morning

HB 36 was introduced as a prefile in the first session of the 26th State Legislature, January 9th 2010.

It moved out of (H) Judiciary four days before the end of the session with three Do Not Pass; Rep. Lindsey Holmes, Rep. Max Gruenberg, Rep. Jay Ramras, Do Pass, Rep.(now Sen.) John Coghill, No Recommendation Nancy Dahlstrom and an Amend by Rep. Bob Lynn.

The initiatives bill then collected several more co-sponsors and moved to (H) Finance where it was heard and held on February 8th of this year. And heard and held again today.

Several amendments were discussed today. None were voted on. Rep. Les Gara (D)-Anchorage voiced concern that the bill would place an onerous price on individuals or groups collecting signatures for initiatives. Among other concerns.

HB 36 was amended in Judiciary last year. Removed was a provision that prevented the re-issuing of a failed initiative for two years after the attempt. However, the bill still deserves to be watched carefully.

The bill is scheduled to be heard tomorrow morning in (H) Finance; Tuesday, March 16th at 9:00 AM.

 

March 10, 2010

2:45 PM -- Energy Bills, Lands Bills, Anti-Cap and Trade Bill Move

SB 220 Energy Efficiency / Alternative Energy has been moved to (S) Finance. Version CSSB220 (RES) passed out of Resources Committee Monday, March 8.

HB 276 Fort Rousseau Causeway Hist Park: an Act amending the description of parcels within the Fort Rousseau Causeway State Historical Park; and providing for an effective date.

Sponsored by Rep. Peggy Wilson, version CSHB 276(CRA) passed the Senate today. HB 276 was read a third time and passed unanimously. It awaits transmittal to the Governor.
Sponsor Statement: http://www.housemajority.org/spon.php?id=26hb276-311

HB 295 University Land Grant: An Act relating to the grant of certain state land to the University of Alaska; relating to the duties of the Board of Regents; relating to deposits made to the Alaska permanent fund received from certain lands conveyed to the University of Alaska; ratifying and reauthorizing certain prior conveyances of land to the University of Alaska; making conforming amendments; and providing for an effective date.

Sponsored by the House Rules Committee by Request of the Governor, HB 295 passed out of (H) Community and Regional Affairs and on to (H) Resources.

ACV prefers the University Lands Bill sponsored by Rep. Jay Ramras, HB 234 Land Grant to University of Alaska.

Sponsor Statement: http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/get_jrn_page.asp?session=26&bill=HB295&jrn=1289&hse=H

HB 329 Dedicated Transport Fund/Pub Transport: an Act relating to the transportation infrastructure fund, to local public transportation, to the municipal harbor facility grant fund, to motor fuel taxes, and to the motor vehicle registration fee; and providing for an effective date.

Sponsored by the House Transportation Committee, the Committee passed CSHB 329(TRA) on to (H) Finance today.

Sponsor Statement: http://www.housemajority.org/spon.php?id=26hb329-330

HJR 49 Opposing EPA Clean Air Act Regulations: Urging the United States Congress to enact S.J. Res. 26, a resolution disapproving the Environmental Protection Agency's imposition of climate regulations that would harm Alaska's economy and the livelihoods of the state's citizens.

Sponsored by Rep. Bill Stoltze, the resolution has a long list of co-sponsors. (H) Resources Committee passed HJR 49 six to one with two Amends from Reps. Scott Kawasaki and Chris Tuck. The resolution is in Rules committee, waiting to be scheduled for the House Floor.

In committee last week, Rep. Guttenberg asked if the resolution might go against the state's push for natural gas development – natural gas is less carbon intensive than coal or oil.

Wednesday's Vote:

Due Pass: Reps. Olson, Bryce Edgmon, Paul Seaton, Peggy Wilson, Mark Neuman, Craig Johnson
Do Not Pass: Rep. David Guttenberg
Amend: Reps. Scott Kawasaki and Chris Tuck


SB 223 Energy Efficiency Bonds; Loans; Fund: an Act authorizing and relating to the issuance of bonds by the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation; establishing the Alaska energy efficiency revolving loan fund and relating to the fund; authorizing municipalities and the State of Alaska to borrow money from the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation for the purposes of the Alaska energy efficiency revolving loan fund; and providing for an effective date.

SB 223 received no fiscal note and its Energy Committee referral was waived. It was moved to Senate Finance Committee today. The bill was sponsored by (S) Rules Committee by Request of the Governor.

 

March 09, 2010

9:13 AM - House Special Committee on Fisheries scheduled to hear HB 46: Mixing Zones

Scheduled to be heard in (H) Fisheries Special Committee on Tuesday March 9th at 10:15 AM in BARNES Rm 124

Sponsored by Rep. Paul Seaton (R)-Homer HB 46 deals with water quality issues and aims to protect Alaska’s citizens and fisheries. 

The bill would compel the Department of Environmental Conservation to collect and make public information regarding the type and amount of pollutants discharged by holders of mixing zone permits.  

Secondly it would temporally expand current mixing zone limitations, making it illegal to release regulated effluent in spawning zones at all times, not only during spawning season.

Finally, the bill requires a public notification and period for comment to accompany all proposed commercially operated sewage discharge increases of over 50%.

March 08, 2010

8:00 PM - Senate Bill 220: Alternative Energy / Energy Efficiency passed out of (S) Resources Committee today. The yea vote was unanimous.

Committee members added several amendments to the omnibus energy bill including amendments that address; nuclear regulation; compressed natural gas vehicles for the state fleet; expanding the Southeast Energy Fund; and leverages $18 in federal State Energy Program funds for a $250 million energy efficiency revolving loan fund among others.

SB 220 now moves to (S) Finance Committee. It has not been scheduled for a hearing.

 

March 08, 2010

12:03 PM -- Follow ACVoters on Twitter from (H) Resources and (S) Resources Committees as the committees hear ACV Priority Legislation today.

 

*ACV Priority Bill

(H)Resources Standing Committee

Mar 08 Monday 1:00 PM in Barnes Rm 124

HJR 49 Opposing Epa Clean Air Act Regulations

SJR 22 Federal Preemption Of Salmon Management

*HB 306 State Energy Policy

Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled

 

(S)Resources Standing Committee

Mar 08 Monday 3:30 PM in Butrovich Rm 205

*SB 220 Energy Efficiency/ Alternative Energy

SJR 27 Fed. Funding: Domestic Seafood Marketing

SB 274 William Jack Hernandez Fish Hatchery

SB 208 Dnr Study On Natural Gas

SB 144 Musk Oxen Permits

Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled

 

March 01, 2010

3:38 PM - Propelled By Fears of Negative Economic Impact, HJR 40 Moves On

Today the House passed House Joint Resolution 40: Cook Inlet Kachemak Beluga Population. The bill now moves to the Senate.

The resolution, sponsored by Representative Charise Millett and co-sponsored by a host of other Republican legislators, opposes the designation of 3,000 square miles of Cook Inlet as critical habitat for the endangered beluga whale. The arguments for passage of HJR 40 have centered on the fear that Alaska cannot both protect the Beluga and continue to grow our economy. This claim is in dispute.

The population of beluga whales was estimated at 321 in 2009, and has been on the rise since outcries over their endangerment caused regulations be put in place over the past decade.  By designating critical habitat, the National Marine Fisheries Services says it aims to further that protection to ensure continued healthy growth of the still endangered population.

A host of testifiers lined up on Wednesday to argue against that protection on Wednesday.  

Members of the commercial and sport fishing industries all the way through representatives from the oil and gas sector have spoken out against the designation, claiming it will have major negative economic consequences.  Although it is unknown what effect the continuation of current use practices and further pollution will have on the beluga whale, it was made very clear that any further regulation through a critical habitat designation will have negative economic repercussions.

This economic forecast carried the day as the resolution, with overwhelming support in the hearing, was moved out of committee. Carrying Zero Fiscal Note, HJR 40 passed out of the House on March 1st, after its third reading and a Reconsideration request by Rep. Kyle Johansen. On reconsideration, one no vote switched and the Bill passed 31 Yes to 2 No. The current version, CSHJR40(RES), is headed for the Senate. 

February 25, 2010

3:45 PM -- Fly Over. Fly By.  Fly Around. And finally, the 2010 Legislative Fly-In

For those folks who have ever lived or worked in Juneau, you know what I’m talking about: the plane is angled on a downward descent as you prepare to land in the Capitol of Alaska.  You hear the wheels come down and the wing flaps moving as the pilot readies for touchdown.  Suddenly, there it is: the fog.  With a sudden lurch of acceleration, the plane rapidly ascends and you know, before the voice on the intercom says anything, that landing in Juneau is just not in the cards. The only question is, where are we headed now?

In the years the Alliance and Voters have been hosting the legislative Fly-In, bringing to Juneau Alaskans from across the state to advocate on conservation issues, the glacial fog has never reaped such havoc as this one.  While a large group of participants did make it into town, most were scattered throughout the Southeast, Ketchikan, Wrangell,

Petersburg, Sitka and even Seattle. In spite of Mother Nature, the 2010 Fly-In was undoubtedly a success as participants made the most of all opportunities and a group of 12 stranded in Sitka even managed to proceed with the agenda in the first ever Sitka Fly-In!  Many eventually did make it to the legislative capitol and were able to meet with their elected officials, participate in the breakfast reception and Alaska Conservation Alliance’s energy efficiency press conference on the REEL in Alaska Roadmap release (link goes to Alaska Conservation Alliance).  A big thank you to all of our Fly-In participants for your flexibility, support and willingness to roll with weather and make the most of a foggy situation.

 

February 23, 2010

2:45 PM -- It's a busy schedule today for (H) Energy Committee. The committee meets in Barnes Rm 124 at 3:00 PM.

On deck:

HB 31 NET ENERGY METERING

HB 303 SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY EFFICIENCY GRANTS

HB 296 ENERGY EFFICIENCY BONDS; LOANS; FUND

HJR 45 OPPOSE FEDERAL CAP & TRADE LEGISLATION

Follow ACVoters on Twitter and Facebook

 

February 20, 2010

12:55 PM - Delay sets meeting back to 1:30 PM at the earliest

(H) Special Committee on Energy

Saturday February 20th at 10:00 AM in HOUSE FINANCE Rm 519

Overviews on Comparative Railbelt Energy Project Analysis:

• Susitna Hydro Project, by Alaska Energy Authority;
• Chakachamna Hydro Project, by TDX Power;
• In-State Natural Gas Pipeline, by Bob Swenson, In-State Gas Pipeline Coordinator;
• Coal Gasification and Fire Island Wind Farm, CIRI;
• Mount Spurr Geothermal Project, by Ormat

If held, ACV will give updates from the committee meeting at ACAAlliance and ACVothers on Twitter.

 

February 19, 2010

12:07 PM - Energy Efficiency projects in Alaska

Wind power turbines have recently been constructed on the windswept Pribilof Islands in the Bearing Sea. During the winter of 2009, sea ice prevented fuel deliveries to the village of St. Paul, and the cost of gasoline soared above $14 per gallon. Wind power can reduce the community's dependence on fossil fuels.

Daniel Cushing’s view of a windfarm on St. Paul Island.

February 17, 2010

Alaska conservation community weighs in on hydro power

Energy has certainly been a big focus for this year’s Alaska state legislature.  The breadth of different energy topics being considered is quite broad, everything from Alaska Conservation Voters and Alaska Conservation Alliance priority legislation on renewable energy generation, energy efficiency and public transportation, to the topics of furthering oil and gas development, coal, nuclear and hydro power projects.

Alaska, as we know, has a ton of renewable energy potential, and while technically not considered a renewable energy source by the Federal Government, Alaska is also blessed with a wealth of prospective hydro power projects, especially in Southeast.  Hydro power is clean, reliable, reduces overall CO2 emissions and as a stably-priced energy source, can provide energy relief to Alaskans.  However, not all hydro power projects are created equal, and proper care must be taken to ensure that the benefits of a hydro power project don’t come at too great an expense to other existing resources. 

Taking these factors into account, member groups of our sister organization the Alaska Conservation Alliance member recently completed and approved a position paper on hydro power projects. It is designed to guide the conservation community’s evaluation of future Alaska hydropower projects using five principles and sets of questions. Read the Alliance Hydro Position Paper here.  The central point of this position paper is that the Alliance members support regionally appropriately sized hydropower projects that are developed correctly with a strong emphasis on fisheries protection and sustaining Alaskans’ environmentally dependent economies and quality of life.  This paper creates an important yardstick Alliance members can use to evaluate future energy projects. 

A big thank you to those member organizations who helped draft, edit and ultimately created and approved the Alliance Hydro Position Paper.  

February 15, 2010

Happy President's Day

8:45 AM -- Though today is a holiday, Senate Resources is scheduled to hear SB220 Alaska Sustainable Energy Act at 3:30 PM in Butrovich Rm 205. Testimony not scheduled.

Senate Resources has a busy week scheduled for SB220, with hearings on Monday, Wednesday and Thursday at 3:30 PM in Butrovich Rm 205.

HB280 Natural Gas, is also scheduled for hearing today at 3:15 PM in Barnes Rm 124.

HB 280 an Act relating to natural gas; relating to a gas storage facility; relating to the Regulatory Commission of Alaska; relating to the participation by the attorney general in a matter involving the approval of a rate or a gas supply contract; relating to an income tax credit for a gas storage facility; relating to oil and gas production tax credits; relating to the powers and duties of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission; relating to production tax credits for certain losses and expenditures, including exploration expenditures; relating to the powers and duties of the director of the division of lands and to lease fees for the storage of gas on state land; and providing for an effective date.

Introduced as a prefile on January 15, HB280 has a long list of signers. Sponsored by Rep. Mike Hawker and Rep. Mike Chenault, it is signed by Rep. Craig Johnson, Rep. Kurt Olson, Rep. Joe Thomas, Rep. Jay Ramras, Rep. John Harris, Rep. Charisse Millett and Rep. Bob Lynn.

HB 280 is scheduled to be heard again Thursday, February 19th at 1:00 PM in Barnes Rm 124.

 

February 12, 2010

6:00 PM – Transportation Committee Debates Dedicated Transportation Fund

The House Transportation Committee met on Tuesday to discuss a proposed amendment to the state constitution that would create a dedicated transportation infrastructure fund.

If passed, HJR 42 puts the fund before the voters during the next general election. Representative Peggy Wilson shepherded the resolution through the committee, moving it out and to the House Finance Committee. Much of the Committee debate took place over the companion bill to HJR 42, House Bill 329.

Progress slowed as the committee took up HB 329 which holds the details of the proposed transportation fund. The bill proposes seeding the fund with a $1 billion allocation, and would sustain it through management of an endowment and additional contributions from state fuel taxes.

The bill provides a breakdown for fund expenditures of which 5% is dedicated to local public transportation and transit.  In addition to setting the terms of the proposed transportation infrastructure fund, the amendment also attempts to "promote and support methods or modes of local public transportation serving persons in various regions of the state" to the DOT&PF duties.

 

5:20 PM – HB 20 Moves On to the Senate Finance Committee

After deliberation in the Senate Resources Committee for the second week in a row, HB 20, was passed on Thursday to the Senate Finance Committee. The bill allows commercial fisherman in Alaska to obtain loans of up to $400,000 to upgrade their vessels for improved energy efficiency. The bill is expected to bolster Alaska's fishing fleet, give the sluggish economy a boost, and reduce carbon emissions.

 

February 8, 2010

7:20 PM -- HB 36 Heard and Held in House Finance Committee

House Bill 36 An Act relating to ballot initiative proposal applications and to ballot initiatives was heard and held in House Finance today. There was no public testimony.

Introduced in the first prefile of 2009, the bill is believed to violate the Alaska constitution and aims to erode Alaskans’ use of the ballot measure as a means to pass legislation. This legislation extends beyond what its title implies and places heavy burdens on public interest groups. ACA/ACV decided last year to oppose SSHB 36. 

The bill is Sponsored by Rep. Kyle Johansen R-Ketchikan, Rep. Charisse Millett R-Anchorage, Rep. Peggy Wilson and signed by Rep. Craig Johnson and Rep. Kelly.

 

6:00 PM -- SB 59 Passes, Moves to Governor

Last Tuesday Senate Bill 59, An Act Relating to Low Speed Vehicles, was sent to the office of the Governor Parnell. Introduced by Senator Stedman, the bill would allow low speed vehicles, vehicles regulated to a maximum 25 mph, to have greater access to Alaskan roads in supporting municipalities with less than 35,000 people.

As electric vehicles have lower emissions and can be charged with renewable resources, this bill moves Alaska’s transportation system towards a cleaner, more sustainable future.

After passing both the House and Senate without a Nay vote, the bill now waits to be signed into law, and will be addressed by February 19th.

 

February 4, 2010

1:18 PM -- What the recent Supreme Court decision on corporate personhood means to Alaska and Alaska Conservation Alliance and Alaska Conservation Voters

Many questions have arisen across the state of Alaska about the effect that the recent United States Supreme Court decision overturning the prohibition of independent expenditures by corporations, unions, and special interest will have on our local elections. There is a great deal of rhetoric flying around the news and the internet about this issue.

Here are some facts:
“On Jan. 21, 2010, a divided Supreme Court removed limits on independent expenditures that are not coordinated with candidates' campaigns. The 5-4 majority also struck down part of the 2003 McCain-Feingold law that barred union- and corporate-paid issue ads in the closing days of election campaigns. The ruling leaves in place a prohibition on direct contributions to candidates from corporations and unions.”i

Currently, both the Alaska Public Offices Commission, which monitors and regulates campaign law and lobbyists throughout the state as well as a team compiled by Alaska State Attorney General Dan Sullivan are researching the decision and determining the effect it will have on state campaign law.ii

What is clear is that this ruling does not affect contributions to a political candidate or a campaign which, in Alaska can only be made by an individual or a political action committee. The decision deals solely with independent expenditures or issue based advertising by a third party with no coordination allowed between the third party and the campaign. For example an ad that runs supporting Candidate Jane Doe for Governor, but paid for by an entity other than Candidate Doe’s Campaign.

• Download a complete list of Campaign Contribution Limits & Restrictions in Alaska or visit http://doa.alaska.gov/apoc/pdf/2009ContributionLimits.pdf
• Related News: http://www.adn.com/news/politics/story/1123571.html
  

Sources:
Oyez - http://otd.oyez.org/articles/2010/01/21/justices-roll-back-campaign-spending-limits-landmark-case-jan-21-2010
KTUU - http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=11879920

 

1:03 PM -- HB 36: The Good, The Bad, and the Is It Really Necessary?

 

A Ballot measure or "Initiative (also known as popular or citizen's initiative) provides a means by which a petition signed by a certain minimum number of registered voters can force a public vote (plebiscite) on a proposed statute, constitutional amendment, charter amendment or ordinance, or, in its minimal form, to simply oblige the executive or legislative bodies to consider the subject by submitting it to the order of the day. It is a form of direct democracy." (source)

Unlike a bill introduced in the legislature, a ballot initiative is not subject to the rigorous vetting process by the legislature and can not be vetoed by the Governor. In Alaska the initiative process was most recently amended in the State Constitution in 2004 and now requires state wide proportional representation, or 21,000 individual signatures of registered voters gathered from 30 out of 40 legislative districts before a proposed ballot measure can be certified for a statewide vote.

HB 36, first introduced in January 2009 by Representative Kyle Johansen and co-sponsored by Representatives Charisse Millett, Peggy Wilson, Craig Johnson, Mike Kelly, seeks to further change the ballot initiative process and significantly increase the reporting requirements for individuals and organizations that sponsor or participate financially in the process, much in the same way that individual campaigns are required to report their donors.

It would also require that prior to the signature gathering process, the proposed ballot initiative would have to have public hearings in each of the four judicial districts across the state featuring, at a minimum, written testimony by at least one pro and one con proponent on the issue and require that more information regarding ballot initiatives be included in the voter pamphlets for regular and special elections.  

HB 36 would also change the way signature gatherers are allowed to operate and the way in which they can be paid for their efforts.

What HB 36 does not do is regulate the source of funds that an initiative can solicit from in or out of state. It also changes the way that proposed ballot measures can be worded.

According to the sponsors of the bill, HB 36 would create a more open and transparent ballot measure process in keeping with the wishes of voters across Alaska who overwhelming supported ethics reform in 2007. According to opponents of the legislation, our initiative process is sufficiently onerous and the HB36 seeks to fix a problem that does not exist in this state.

Below are some resources to help you in forming your own opinion about this important issue:

--

Read the the full text of the current incarnation of HB36

--

For differing viewpoints on this issue visit these sources:

Rep. Johansen's Sponsor Statement published on his Legislative Website

 

Steve Cleary's OpEd published last year in the Juneau Empire

 

 

February 3, 2010

2:30 PM -- Senate Resources Committee to Discuss Important Energy Legislation

Today the Senate Resources Committee will be holding a session to discuss important energy legislation.   The first piece up for deliberation is SB 220, the Senate Omnibus Energy Bill on which there has already been some discussion and much positive testimony. The bill, dubbed the Alaska Sustainable Energy Act, lays out a state energy policy and includes previously submitted proposals addressing a wide variety of today's pressing energy issues. 

Time permitting, the committee will also discuss HB 20, an act pertaining to commercial fishing loans to upgrade vessels for the purpose of improving energy efficiency.  The bill comes to Senate Resources with overwhelming support from the House, and has also been referred to the Finance Committee.

Alaska Conservation Alliance will be at the hearing following today's events.  Keep up with us on our website or check for updates on Facebook or Twitter.

1:45 PM -- House Special Committee on Energy passes HB 306

The Alaska state legislature made progress towards a statewide energy policy on Tuesday as the House Special Committee on Energy passed HB 306.  The proposal aims to lay the foundation for a state energy strategy that will provide reliable, affordable energy to citizens across Alaska.  It also sets specific goals for energy efficiency and increased use of renewable energy sources.  HB 306 is now on its way to the House Resources Committee for approval.

 

February 1, 2010

3:46 PM -- HJR 40 Opposes Critical Habitat Designation
Representative Charisse Millett last week released a resolution (HJR 40) opposing the proposed designation of critical habitat for the endangered beluga whale by the National Marine Fisheries Service. The NMFS proposal aims to protect 3,000 square miles of Cook Inlet to protect the beluga whale listed as an endangered species in 2008.

Representative Millet claimed in a press release this week that, "the only thing a critical habitat designation will accomplish is to harm the region's economy."  The resolution cites evidence that the decimation of the beluga population was caused solely by unsustainable harvest and states that, "the conservation benefits, which are entirely uncertain and speculative, are outweighed by the costs and impediments posed by designation of critical habitat."

The resolution was co-sponsored Reps Mark Neuman, Bob Lynn, Craig Johnson, Wes Keller and Carl Gatto, and is supported by Governor Parnell and the entire Alaskan congressional delegation.

Copies of the resolution will be sent to the various national and state offices including that of President Obama. 

Support for the resolution seems strong in the House where it was referred only to the Resources Committee, but its reception in the Senate with its bi-partisan majority remains to be seen.

 

January 28, 2010

2:41 PM -- Great Turnout at SB 220 Hearing Yesterday

The Senate Resources Committee took public testimony on SB 220, the Alaska Sustainable Energy Act, yesterday. Thirty-one people testified, all in support of the bill.  Testifiers included individuals from the Alaska Municipal League, Southeast Conference, Sealaska Corporation, the Alaska Ratepayers Association, the Cascadia Green Building Council, the Alaska State Home Builders Association, and the Alaska Sealife Center, among other organizations.

We also heard from several Alaskan energy entrepreneurs interested in the Emerging Technology Fund. Many of these entrepreneurs suggested that the state encourage the sharing of data on emerging technologies, so "we can all grow together." 

The response from Senators on the committee, audience members at the hearing, and legislative staff appeared quite positive.

The Alaska Conservation Voters and its sister organization the Alaska Conservation Alliance helped organize testifiers and we're pleased with the result. As one person testified last night "It's great to hear all these engaged, intelligent voices and know that these people live in Alaska and are helping shape our future."

12:46 PM -- U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski Pushes "Dirty Air Act"

Senator Lisa Murkowski has introduced S.J. Res. 26 in the U.S. Senate. This measure would reverse a Supreme Court ruling that the Environmental Protection Agency can regulate greenhouse gasses. It would essentially weaken the Clean Air Act. This immediate threat to progress on climate change must be defeated. Please contact Senators Murkowski and Mark Begich now (see below for contact information).

Consider this:

• The Clean Air Act is a law with a nearly 40-year track record of cutting dangerous pollution to protect human health and the environment and spur innovation and efficiency.
• Global Warming is heating up the planet right now: Temperatures this decade have been higher than any other decade on record, and one degree (F) higher than average temperatures in the 20th century.
• Ocean temperatures worldwide this summer were hotter than ever previously recorded.
• Sea ice extent in the Arctic melted to its third lowest recorded level this summer. Sea levels are projected to rise faster than we thought since the last time the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change weighed in. Without emission reductions, a 2.6 foot rise is likely by the end of the century and a 6.6 foot rise is possible.
• Carbon dioxide levels for2009 (387 parts per million) are the highest they have been in at least 800,000years and possibly as long as 15 million years.Globally, an estimated 8.7 billion tons of carbon were emitted in 2008 from the burning of coal, oil and natural gas, a more than 40 percent increase from 1990.
• The ocean's ability to absorb carbon dioxide is declining as the ocean heats up and becomes more acidic. In 1959, the ocean absorbed 60 percent of the extra Co2 we put into the atmosphere. In 2008, it only absorbed 55 percent.
• Studies indicate that the Earth will take a long time-at least a thousand years-to come back into balance and recover from the excess CO2 we are putting into the atmosphere. Every day of delay locks in more warming for ourselves and future generations.

 

Sen. Lisa Murkowski
709 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-6665  Fax (202) 224-5301

Sen. Mark Begich
825c Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

10:50 -- Visit Juneau during the Legislative Session: An Argument

I’m just a bill.  A bill on (Juneau’s) Capitol Hill.  Ok, I’ve modified the song just a bit, but most of us probably remember this Schoolhouse Rock ditty, learning about the process for a bill to become law.  But, have you ever been to Juneau and witnessed the process in action?  Have you ever sat in on a committee hearing and watched the interplay between committee members and observed the rules of conduct?  Have you ever scheduled a meeting with your state senator to advocate on issues that matter to you and your neighborhood?  Or had your state representative introduce you on the floor?     

It’s a powerful experience, and one that I recommend for every Alaskan.

You can see for yourself that the process the song outlines is much the same, but passing a law is not as simple as the song suggests.  There are politics and personalities in play, priorities and budget considerations to take into account.   In other words, it’s a process that involves real people. By coming to Juneau, you have the opportunity to meet with those people, the people who represent your district, present your perspective and influence legislation.

It doesn’t even require a trip to Juneau, thanks to the Legislative Information Offices, which can be found in most Alaskan communities, or you can meet with your legislators during the interim, when the session is over and the elected officials are back in town.  But for the full experience, for the chance to roam the halls of the capitol and connect one-on-one with your legislators, a chance to address laws that impact you as they’re being considered, traveling to Juneau during the session is the best.

That’s where Alaska Conservation Voters can help. Our legislative Fly-In brings motivated individuals down to Juneau for three days to learn about the legislative process, get up to speed on hot-topic energy legislation (like renewable energy and energy efficiency), and finally, meet with your legislators and advocate on this legislation.  You can learn more about our energy priorities on this  Web site.

So if renewable energy and energy efficiency issues are important to you and you want the experience of traveling to Juneau and becoming an advocate, consider signing up with us.  Applications are on this website.

 

January 26, 2010

Today at 3:00pm the House Energy Committee will be meeting to hear HB 305: Omnibus Energy Bill, and HB 306: State Energy Policy. These bills share some similarities with the Senate Bill 220: Alaska Sustainable Energy Act such as the inclusion of explicit goals for energy efficiency and renewable energy production. However, there are also important differences with regards to nuclear and coal.

We will be attending the hearing and reporting back to keep you abreast of the committee climate and reactions to the presentation.  Or follow along on Gavel to Gavel.

 

January 25, 2010

5:00 PM Low speed Motor Vehicles get new lease on life

Senate Bill 59 Low-speed Motor Vehicles, sponsored by Sen. Bert Stedman (R) Sitka has passed the House and awaits Concurrence in the Senate.

The bill would allow Low-speed Motor Vehicles, limited by Federal law to 25mph top speed, to access 45mph roads. By allowing low speed vehicles to access more mileage of state and municipal roads the bill is expected to allow those already in possession of a low-speed vehicle to get more use out of their investment while at the same time giving an added incentive to low-speed vehicle purchases by meeting more customer needs.

4:30 PM Next up: New Ferry Construction

The Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS) is awaiting action from legislators regarding the go-ahead for a new Alaska Class ferry to serve routes in the Southeast.

Proposals for new ferries have long been in the works to replace members of the AMHS's aging fleet. The modern, energy-efficient design includes passenger comforts such as quieter running volume, improved seating, and group meeting spaces.

With design nearly complete, the project's future is now up to legislative funding. The Federal Government approved the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program with up to $60million in December.

Governor Sean Parnell did not include funding for the new ferry in his 2011 budget. However, an amendment can bring those funds back into play and move the project into the construction phase.

 

January 21, 2010

3:14 PM -- A quick update on some energy legislation introduced yesterday, specifically related to the priority bills.

Of the many energy related things introduced, one bill – the senate’s Alaska Sustainable Energy Act (SB 220) – was an exciting introduction that seems to have some traction. It was discussed yesterday in the Senate Resources committee and was scheduled to be discussed again today during the committee meeting. Today's meeting was canceled.

The Senate Resources committee introduced items with money attached to them this morning during a press conference at 11 a.m.

Included in the bill are 2 of our 3 priorities – the emerging energy tech fund and energy efficiency for public buildings bills. Unfortunately, no Regional Transit Authority (SB 152) stuff. Bills like SB152 tend to stay in singular form, rather than being rolled into an omnibus, because they’re just too complicated to deal with in a giant package of bills. Though that doesn’t mean it won’t be eventually rolled in if the powers that be deem that appropriate.

This means that on the senate side, discussions about Energy Efficiency (SB 121) and Emerging Energy Technology (SB 150) will likely happen now in the context of SB 220.

 

10:09 AM -- The second hearing for SB 220, the Senate Energy Committee Omnibus Bill, will not take place in Senate Resources Committee this afternoon at 3:30pm.

 

January 20, 2010

The House and Senate Energy Committees each introduced new energy legislation Yesterday afternoon, HB 305, HB 306 and SB 220 respectively.

HB 306 "An Act declaring a state energy policy" was referred to the House Energy and Resources Committees.

HB 305 OMNIBUS ENERGY BILL was referred to the House Energy, Finance and Resources Committees.

SB 220 Energy Efficiency / Alternative Energy was referred to Senate Resources and Finance Committees. Heard today, the bill is scheduled to be heard again Thursday in S RES at 3:30pm in Butrovich Rm 205.

 

January 19, 2010

Hello and welcome to the Alaska Conservation Alliance blogspot.

Today here in Juneau the 26th Alaska State Legislature will open its doors to begin the 2010 legislative session. A slow economy on the verge of a predicted upswing, a series of upcoming elections, high but unpredictable fuel prices, and a series of energy proposals that will set the course for Alaska's future combine to set an exciting stage as officials from around the state converge on the capital.

The Alaska Conservation Voters will be in the middle of the action throughout the term, working to make sure conservation minded Alaskans are heard. Simultaneously we will be keeping an ear to the ground so that we can help keep you informed of what is happening with our government and what policies are being enacted for the future of our state.

Tune in for regular blogs on this site, as well as updates on Facebook and Twitter. Stay in the loop with the goings on around the capitol and the political, economic, and environmental implications for Alaska at large.